It is almost hard to say enough good things about the new Garmin Forerunner 610. It is a GPS watch with heart rate monitor and the first ever with touch screen navigation capabilities.
Garmin has always been the leader in integrated GPS watch technology but this latest top-of-the-line running and cycling watch has added numerous upgrades in the heart rate area as well. For instance, there is a new training load factor that considers your cumulative training and the state of your body to help you adjust your training.
In our initial testing the biggest single improvement was not related to what this watch measures but how it displays it. The vertical arrangement of lines separating the metrics makes them so much easier to read than ever before. It is an odd little discovery that has made a world of difference when it comes to ease of use.
What does the Garmin Forerunner 610 lack?
Two things really: 1.) It does not have enough battery life to go beyond 7 hours in once session, so it is not an ultra-marathon or long course triathlon watch, and 2.) it does not display power output on the bike like the Garmin 310XT does. This means that the Garmin 310XT gets to keep its title as the triathlon and ultra watch.
Pulling the Garmin 610 out of the box it is noticeable that several things have changed from previous versions. First, the watch has a much more slender profile and the backing is made of a much more anatomical shape making this the best fitting Garmin ever in our opinion. Gone are the wing extensions that made the 405 and 410 a much more difficult fit. Gone is the need to have a second Velcro strap to create the right fit for larger and smaller wrists. This watch has corrected Garmin’s “fit problems”.
The new battery charging cable is curved and snaps on to the back of the watch. A word of caution: Snap the charger onto the watch before plugging in or you can get shocked. It is a bit different than the old claw clip.
to move your data on to your favorite training software. One of the really nice things about all Garmin fitness products is their Mac compatibility. Polar has Mac compatibility on its new RCX5 watch and Suunto is still struggling to become Mac compatible, so Garmin is the obvious choice in fitness watches for Mac users.
Our unit must have been partially charged because it was charged in a few minutes fresh out of the box, but, somewhere between one hour and 90 minutes is a good bet when the battery is low.
Don’t forget to watch the great training videos done by Jake at Garmin. You can watch those videos here. Garmin and Polar both offer training video resources which are very helpful for getting up to speed on your new purchase.
The big advantage for touch screen is just how fast it allows you to navigate. This technology is so much faster than buttons that you may never go back to a traditional watch again. Forgetting about bezel, or button based, navigation is real easy once you’ve used the 610.
It also takes a very deliberate push of the screen icons to get them to change. This is a good thing because it means that unintentional screen brushes and bumps will not change anything. This is precisely why there is no locking feature required with this watch.
This watch truly has the most slender profile of any GPS watch ever made. From base to top the 610 measured 1.4 centimeters while the Garmin 410 measured 1.6 centimeters. The 610 is modestly heavier at 3 ounces, compared with 2.5 ounces for the 410.
The weight difference is likely attributable to the steel cased backside of the 610 which should add greater durability to this watch over the 410. This watch just has that solid feel to it from the moment you put it on and not like it came out of a Chinese cost-cutting production line.
The Forerunner 405 and 410 both had rigid wings protruding outward as part of the band structure. This was problematic because the watches only fit one size of wrist well while small wrists had side gaps and large wrists had a watch that hovered above the wrist. This is why Garmin had Velcro bands, along with the ease of removal.
The 610 no longer contains these rigid wings and would fit small wrists, like my wife Elaine who is only 5 ½ inches circumference. That is a photo of her wrist below with the 610 attached and we did not notice the gaps that she had with the 410 or 405. Hurray, gaps are gone.
The watch doesn’t look like a behemoth on a petite wrist either, like the Garmin 410 or 310XT can. Granted it does not come in the latest spring colors from Paris, but it doesn’t look abnormal, or out of place, on a woman’s wrist either. The girls can wear this GPS.
People always try to pigeonhole Garmin as just a runner’s watch, but the 610 is equally adept at cycling, inline skating, hiking, skiing and other sports thanks to a cycling mode that displays speed in miles, or kilometers, per hour. This is pretty handy because you can use the cycling mode for just about everything except running and hiking.
Unless you run ultra-marathons, or are on the trail for over 7 to 8 hours at a crack, then this watch should be fine for your needs. Battery life expires between 7 and 8 hours of use.
This watch is not for swimming and it is not a triathlon watch unless you want to leave it on the bike for a sprint or half-Ironman race. It isn’t suitable for a full Ironman because of battery constraints.
The Garmin 310XT is the watch for swimmers, ultra-runners and long course triathlons.
This watch is suitable for runners, cyclists, mountain bikers, skiers and other outdoor athletes who want great data and mapping in activities that last from 1 to 8 hours in duration.
GPS is not perfectly accurate for altitude because it is not a finely honed barometric altimeter – no watch is. Being off 20 to 100 feet on a big climb is not unusual, being off hundreds of feet is. It is still a nice indicator of the amount of climbing and descending you have done.
We noticed the climbing and descending features with the Garmin Edge 800 but it will drive you crazy if you start and finish at the same point because it never seems that the amount of climbing perfectly corresponds to the amount of descending – such is the case for all GPS measured vertical distance.
When it comes to maps and a mapping community, Garmin Connect is awesome software. It is like a Facebook for runners, cyclists and triathlon competitors who want to share routes, times, and more.
There are two types of technology that can give you speed and distance data running:
Ryan Hall used a Forerunner 210 when he did a blistering 2:04 in the Boston Marathon in April of 2011. This is a pure runner’s watch with no ability to shift in to a cycling or other sports, it is purely running all the way and uses a button driven navigation system.
The vibration alert is really helpful running. When you are really into it and focused on your stride, posture, breathing and arm swing, there is not a lot of time to be looking at your watch, which is what makes the vibration alert so useful. If you violate heart rate zones or pacing goals the watch gives you a gentle buzz. This is really useful as your parameters become better defined and for fine tuning your training.
The ability to observe your courses and mountain charts to see precisely how you were doing at the top of a big hill is part of what makes Garmin Connect so useful. Drag the icon to the top of a big hill and freeze it to see your heart rate. Drag it one-quarter mile past the summit to observe your recovery. It is pretty cool stuff.
The new Training Effect feature is also very useful for running because it examines your cumulative training and observes your recovery to help analyze and adjust your training. It takes a week or more in the Training Effect mode for the watch to get to know your body and your training so this feature is not immediately useful.
The fact that you do not have to have all sorts of other sensors like foot pods is nice. The learning curve to the watch, like anything new, will take about a week of use but watching the training videos can really help with the initial set-up.
Pacing goals can be established by using the Virtual Partner or Virtual Racer features. Both functions allow you to compete against a pre-established pace.
I love watches for cycling. Especially mountain biking where the constant jarring can dislodge most bike computer mounts. A watch strapped around a handlebar mount is not going anywhere, even if you and the bike become separated.
Cycling watches give you a true duality of purpose in that they act as more than just a bike computer, they can serve as a daily heart rate monitor and wrist watch too, so it eliminates the need to own multiple devices.
The 610 syncs up with a cadence sensor and can display your speed in miles, or kilometers, per hour. It does lack the ability to pick up power meters like the 310XT, so for hard core triathlon competitors and road cyclists that train based upon power this watch is not a good solution.
If you would like heart rate data, speed, distance, mapping, cadence and elevations then the 610 could make a good cycling companion. It might not fit the bill for serious road bikers but it is great for the semi-serious road cyclists and mountain bikers of all levels.
Unlike the Garmin Edge 800, which measures inclination, or percentage grade, the 610 does not possess this feature.
We feel that the Garmin 610 is the most innovative new watch product for runners for 2011 and that it also makes a good cycling watch. Swimmers and triathlon competitors will have to look elsewhere and ultra-marathon participants need to consider the Garmin 310XT for its battery life.
Initial buyer comments have been generally quite good, however one small female noted that the watch just was not a good fit for her and that it felt heavy (it is 3 ounces).
The touch screen navigation requires a little learning but the way this watch displays metrics and data is among the best we have found.
Source:
Rusty Squire
Heart Rate Monitor Blogger
|
what is your view and opinion on the Polar -RS300X?
The Polar RS300X is a good heart rate monitor with built-in timers. I’ve heard some complaints of its lack of water resistance but only from a limited few people.
You can match the Polar RS300X up with the Polar S1 foot pod (a bit bulky) or the G1 GPS sensor (also a bit bulky). Polar’s new RCX5 watch is the one I think that is currently making all other Polar watches obsolete – the new S3-Plus foot pod is far better and the new G5 GPS sensor is so small that it finally makes the external sensor nearly a non-event.
However, for the money the RS300X is still a pretty darn good buy since you have to double down in terms of cost to get the RCX5 over the RS300X.
Sincerely,
Rusty Squire
Heart Rate Watch Co.
I have the {Polar rs400sd, and want to upgrade to either the Garmin 610 or the Polar 800cx. I am mainly a runner (half-marathon my ideal distance), but plan to enter a triathlon in a few months. I;ve heard horror stories about the 610 quality-wise and bugs, etc but definitely like this watch a lot. Which one would you recommend me to buy? Thanks
I have not heard of any horror stories, just simply that some of the earliest 610′s released had a charger issue – Garmin honored the warranty on them all and the latest versions have been fine. Like many newer products it required a firmware update that was also added just after the watches release. This can all be easily fixed by adding Garmin’s Webupdater software to your computer.
I’m using a 610 right now personally and I very much like it – here is a link to that bike ride here – http://connect.garmin.com/activity/99576008 Didn’t wear my HRM that day – sorry!
You might also consider the new Polar RCX5. I am just completing a review of it but it is also a nice watch for tri.
Sincerely,
Rusty Squire
I’ve just ordered the 610 after returning my Polar RCX5. Their dreadfully slow response to Mac OS X Lion coming out meant that a week after buying it, I couldn’t upload to Polar Personal Trainer. It also lacked the ability to hold training programs for more than one sport at a time. I compete in triathlon and intend to use the 610 for the run and my regular road bike, and an Edge 500 or its replacement for my tri bike. Both together are costing me less than the RCX5 (wIthout the G5 GPS). Polar seriously missed an opportunity here.
This is a very interesting issue that we had not thought about and we will certainly look into it some more. Thanks for pointing this out.
Cheers,
Rusty Squire
Does any video that describing how to use this garmin
Great watch!!!
Using it now for over a month.
I’m a triathlete and use the 610. After loving my Suunto T6 for years I decided to give up on Suunto as theynare clearly not interested in keeping their interface useful. It has the same bugs as previous versions that are years old. They acknowledge an issue only to ignore it – too bad. Watch alone they have the best platform.
The 610′s menus are not as intuitive & I find that I’m messing around with the watch more than I would like but that also has come down as I use it more. Interface w/ web-based software is clearly the way to go. It does use Training Effect from First Beat which is great but they haven’t imbraced including this information outside if the watch (in their Garmin Connect) yet. Let’s hope they are more proactive than Suunto.
clearly an innovative and great watch but stil la big issue to replace broken parts like bracelets or even the 610 charger! the one i bought is deffecting, i can’t load the battery at all coz of a bad contact probably due to the charger, can you advise where to buy online this charger, same query for easy breakable bracelets of the forerunner 405! why is garmin not providing after sales for these small elements? a frustrated 3 years avide user living in bangkok
Just a word of warning on this watch. The edge of the screen is easily damaged. In my case i only had the watch a few weeks and one day looked down and noticed a mark on the sceen. As i looked closer i realized it was a chip out of the screen. No marks on the casing and only use the device for running, i was totally disappointed. Spoke to customer service – sent in pics and they refused to repair or replace the watch. I was only offered the ability to buy a replacement for $370. Not an option when i already paid $499 to purchase the watch in the first place. Have read similar stories on the net – do your research.
Regards
R
We talked to several dealers and they claim that they have not had the same problem getting units with screen cracks warrantied.
I’m not sure what dealer you went through to buy the unit but it might be worth contacting them directly and then having them go to Garmin.
Best,
Lisa